Interdisziplinäres Lagebild in Echtzeit
Erkenntnisse und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Verbesserung der Lagefrüherkennung
und der Lagebewältigung

„Vor dem Hintergrund bisheriger Erfahrungen und in Anbetracht künftiger Herausforderungen
ist als Grundlage für Führung und Krisenmanagement die Entwicklung eines Interdisziplinären Lagebildes
in Echtzeit rund um die Uhr für Deutschland unter Nutzung zukunftsweisender Technologien überfällig.“

„In insgesamt 30 konkreten Handlungsempfehlungen wird dargestellt, wie zukunftsorientiert ein Interdisziplinäres Lagebild in Echtzeit für Deutschland generiert werden kann. Voraussetzung dafür ist, auf Grundlage einer grundsätzlichen (politischen) Entscheidung ein geeignetes Kooperationsnetzwerk zu schaffen, in dem Daten und Informationen aus unterschiedlichen IT-Systemen und Datenbanken“ zusammengeführt werden.“

Interdisciplinary situation picture in real time
Findings and recommendations for action to improve early situation detection and situation management
“Against the background of previous experiences and in view of future challenges the development of an interdisciplinary situation picture in real time and around the clock for in real time around the clock for Germany using forward-looking technologies is overdue.”

 “In a total of 30 concrete recommendations for action, it is presented how future-oriented an interdisciplinary situation picture can be generated in real time for Germany. The prerequisite for this is, a suitable cooperation network on the basis of a fundamental (political) decision in which data and information from different IT systems and databases can be brought together.”

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

48 S.,  März 2023
https://zoes-bund.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/230411_Gruenbuch_Lagebild-digital.pdf

—————————————————————————–
Remarks:

This GreenBook is a basic first documentation of ideas how to start Requirements Engineering in parts of the very complex landscape of RISK Information Management.

The 30 recommendations need further comparisons to many other fundamental and transparent Information Infrastructures that are successfully based on national/European laws as well as publicly negotiated documentations, specifications, implementations, maintenance, completion and achievement of objectives control (according to existing best national and European practice).
(the term “Information Infrastructure in this document is used only in terms of “Geoinformation”, while the plethora of data to be considered in RISK information management currently lacks all that semantic and procedural interoperability needed for holistic approaches of any kind and level.)  

Thus, this document can be considered a good reason for starting open, participative discussions in all the RISK partners (not limited to Politics, Administration and Management of BOS (Authorities and organizations with security tasks).

And probably there will be important contributions to the improvement of the concept from the experiences in Austria, Switzerland, other members of the European Union as well as from global partners (US, Australia etc. etc.)

Horst Kremers